Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder coding mining object" » "coder coder coding using object" (Expand search), "coder coder mining mining object" (Expand search), "coder coder coding canine object" (Expand search), "coder coder coding moving object" (Expand search), "coder coder coding mining reject" (Expand search), "coder coder coding managing object" (Expand search), "coder modern coding mining object" (Expand search), "coder color coding mining object" (Expand search), "coder odor coding mining object" (Expand search), "coder decoder coding mining object" (Expand search), "code code coding mining object" (Expand search), "decoder codec coding mining object" (Expand search)
"in python pythin python programming" » "in python python python programming" (Expand search), "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in python pythons python programming" (Expand search), "in python piton python programming" (Expand search), "_ python pyth_ python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder coding mining object") OR ("in python pythin python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder coding mining object\") OR (\"in python pythin python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder coding mining object ) OR ( in python pythin python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder coding mining object") OR ("in python pythin python programming"))*.