Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)
"coder coder coding line detector" » "coder coder coding line detection" (Expand search), "coder coder coding alice detector" (Expand search), "coder coder coding large detector" (Expand search), "coder modern coding line detector" (Expand search), "coder color coding line detector" (Expand search), "coder odor coding line detector" (Expand search), "coder decoder coding line detector" (Expand search), "code code coding line detector" (Expand search), "decoder codec coding line detector" (Expand search), "coder coder coping line detector" (Expand search), "coder coder coating line detector" (Expand search), "coder coder coding in detector" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder coding line detector\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder coding line detector ) OR ( in python python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder coding line detector") OR ("in python python python programming"))*.