Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)
"coder coder coding lie detection" » "coder coder coding line detection" (Expand search), "coder coder coding fire detection" (Expand search), "coder coder coding eye detection" (Expand search), "coder modern coding lie detection" (Expand search), "coder color coding lie detection" (Expand search), "coder odor coding lie detection" (Expand search), "coder decoder coding lie detection" (Expand search), "code code coding lie detection" (Expand search), "decoder codec coding lie detection" (Expand search), "coder coder coding time detection" (Expand search), "coder coder coding in detection" (Expand search), "coder coder coding the detection" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder coding lie detection\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder coding lie detection ) OR ( in python python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder coding lie detection") OR ("in python python python programming"))*.