Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)
"coder coder coding legal effect" » "coder modern coding legal effect" (Expand search), "coder color coding legal effect" (Expand search), "coder odor coding legal effect" (Expand search), "coder coder cloning legal effect" (Expand search), "coder coder coding legalism effect" (Expand search), "coder coder binding legal effect" (Expand search), "coder coder coding legal effects" (Expand search), "coder coder coding lethal effect" (Expand search), "coder coder coding local effect" (Expand search), "coder decoder coding legal effect" (Expand search), "code code coding legal effect" (Expand search), "decoder codec coding legal effect" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder coding legal effect\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder coding legal effect ) OR ( in python python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder coding legal effect") OR ("in python python python programming"))*.