Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)
"coder coder coding it proposes" » "coder modern coding it proposes" (Expand search), "coder color coding it proposes" (Expand search), "coder odor coding it proposes" (Expand search), "coder decoder coding it proposes" (Expand search), "code code coding it proposes" (Expand search), "decoder codec coding it proposes" (Expand search), "coder coder coding pt proposed" (Expand search), "coder coder coding and proposes" (Expand search), "coder coder coding it processes" (Expand search), "coder coder coding in proposes" (Expand search), "coder coder coding at proposes" (Expand search), "coder coder coding is proposes" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder coding it proposes") OR ("in python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder coding it proposes\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))*".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder coding it proposes ) OR ( in python python python programming ))*.