Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"in python pythons python programming" » "in python python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in python pitons python programming" (Expand search), "in python piton python programming" (Expand search), "_ python pythons python programming" (Expand search)
"coder coder coding is object" » "coder modern coding is object" (Expand search), "coder color coding is object" (Expand search), "coder odor coding is object" (Expand search), "coder decoder coding is object" (Expand search), "code code coding is object" (Expand search), "decoder codec coding is object" (Expand search), "coder coder coding in object" (Expand search), "coder coder coding ts object" (Expand search), "coder coder coding its1 object" (Expand search), "coder coder coding its object" (Expand search), "coder coder coding s object" (Expand search), "coder coder coding vs object" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder coding is object") OR ("in python pythons python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder coding is object\") OR (\"in python pythons python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder coding is object ) OR ( in python pythons python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder coding is object") OR ("in python pythons python programming"))*.