Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder coding invariants under" » "coder coder coding variants under" (Expand search), "coder coder using invariants under" (Expand search), "coder coder linking invariants under" (Expand search), "coder coder coding invariant under" (Expand search), "coder coder coding invariance under" (Expand search), "coder coder coding invariants and" (Expand search), "coder modern coding invariants under" (Expand search), "coder color coding invariants under" (Expand search), "coder odor coding invariants under" (Expand search), "coder decoder coding invariants under" (Expand search), "code code coding invariants under" (Expand search), "decoder codec coding invariants under" (Expand search)
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder coding invariants under\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder coding invariants under ) OR ( in python python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder coding invariants under") OR ("in python python python programming"))*.