Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder coding insertions in" » "coder coder coding inserting in" (Expand search), "coder coder bodily insertions in" (Expand search), "coder coder coding conventions in" (Expand search), "coder coder coding insertion in" (Expand search), "coder coder coding insertion into" (Expand search), "coder coder coding insertion of" (Expand search), "coder modern coding insertions in" (Expand search), "coder color coding insertions in" (Expand search), "coder odor coding insertions in" (Expand search), "coder decoder coding insertions in" (Expand search), "code code coding insertions in" (Expand search), "decoder codec coding insertions in" (Expand search)
"on python python python programming" » "on pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "on piton python python programming" (Expand search), "on pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "in python pythin python programming" (Expand search), "of python pythof python programming" (Expand search), "_ python pyth_ python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder coding insertions in") OR ("on python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder coding insertions in\") OR (\"on python python python programming\"))*".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder coding insertions in ) OR ( on python python python programming ))*.