Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder coding insertion of" » "coder coder coding inserting of" (Expand search), "coder coder using insertion of" (Expand search), "coder coder during insertion of" (Expand search), "coder modern coding insertion of" (Expand search), "coder color coding insertion of" (Expand search), "coder odor coding insertion of" (Expand search), "coder decoder coding insertion of" (Expand search), "code code coding insertion of" (Expand search), "decoder codec coding insertion of" (Expand search)
"via pythons python python programming" » "via pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "via piton python python programming" (Expand search), "via pythons piton python programming" (Expand search), "via pythons pitons python programming" (Expand search), "via pythons pytm python programming" (Expand search), "via python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder coding insertion of\") OR (\"via pythons python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder coding insertion of ) OR ( via pythons python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder coding insertion of") OR ("via pythons python python programming"))*.