Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder coding indirect objects" » "coder coder coding indirect object" (Expand search), "coder coder coding indirect effects" (Expand search), "coder coder coding direct object" (Expand search), "coder coder using indirect objects" (Expand search), "coder coder comida indirect objects" (Expand search), "coder coder during indirect objects" (Expand search), "coder modern coding indirect objects" (Expand search), "coder color coding indirect objects" (Expand search), "coder odor coding indirect objects" (Expand search), "coder decoder coding indirect objects" (Expand search), "code code coding indirect objects" (Expand search), "decoder codec coding indirect objects" (Expand search)
"in python pythin python programming" » "in python python python programming" (Expand search), "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in python pythons python programming" (Expand search), "in python piton python programming" (Expand search), "_ python pyth_ python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder coding indirect objects") OR ("in python pythin python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder coding indirect objects\") OR (\"in python pythin python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder coding indirect objects ) OR ( in python pythin python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder coding indirect objects") OR ("in python pythin python programming"))*.