Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"in python pythons python programming" » "in python python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in python pitons python programming" (Expand search), "in python piton python programming" (Expand search), "_ python pythons python programming" (Expand search)
"coder coder coding in detecting" » "coder modern coding in detecting" (Expand search), "coder color coding in detecting" (Expand search), "coder odor coding in detecting" (Expand search), "coder coder coding _ detecting" (Expand search), "coder decoder coding in detecting" (Expand search), "code code coding in detecting" (Expand search), "decoder codec coding in detecting" (Expand search), "coder coder coding rna detecting" (Expand search), "coder coder coding and detecting" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder coding in detecting") OR ("in python pythons python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder coding in detecting\") OR (\"in python pythons python programming\"))*".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder coding in detecting ) OR ( in python pythons python programming ))*.