Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder coding in dependence" » "coder coder coding and dependence" (Expand search), "coder coder coding in dependencia" (Expand search), "coder coder coding field dependence" (Expand search), "coder modern coding in dependence" (Expand search), "coder color coding in dependence" (Expand search), "coder odor coding in dependence" (Expand search), "coder decoder coding in dependence" (Expand search), "code code coding in dependence" (Expand search), "decoder codec coding in dependence" (Expand search), "coder coder coding rna dependence" (Expand search), "coder coder coding _ dependence" (Expand search)
"_ python python python programming" » "_ pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ piton python python programming" (Expand search), "_ pitons python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder coding in dependence") OR ("_ python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder coding in dependence\") OR (\"_ python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder coding in dependence ) OR ( _ python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder coding in dependence") OR ("_ python python python programming"))*.