Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder coding gender effects" » "coder coder coding gene effects" (Expand search), "coder coder coding peer effects" (Expand search), "coder coder coding order effects" (Expand search), "coder coder dodging gender effects" (Expand search), "coder coder coding genes effects" (Expand search), "coder modern coding gender effects" (Expand search), "coder color coding gender effects" (Expand search), "coder odor coding gender effects" (Expand search), "coder decoder coding gender effects" (Expand search), "code code coding gender effects" (Expand search), "decoder codec coding gender effects" (Expand search)
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder coding gender effects") OR ("in python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder coding gender effects\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder coding gender effects ) OR ( in python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder coding gender effects") OR ("in python python python programming"))*.