Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder coding gender effect" » "coder coder dodging gender effect" (Expand search), "coder coder coding genes effect" (Expand search), "coder coder coding gene effect" (Expand search), "coder coder coding gender effects" (Expand search), "coder coder coding gender affect" (Expand search), "coder coder coding under effect" (Expand search), "coder modern coding gender effect" (Expand search), "coder color coding gender effect" (Expand search), "coder odor coding gender effect" (Expand search), "coder decoder coding gender effect" (Expand search), "code code coding gender effect" (Expand search), "decoder codec coding gender effect" (Expand search)
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder coding gender effect") OR ("in python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder coding gender effect\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder coding gender effect ) OR ( in python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder coding gender effect") OR ("in python python python programming"))*.