Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder coding functions predict" » "coder coder coding function prediction" (Expand search), "coder coder coding functional prediction" (Expand search), "coder coder scoring functions predict" (Expand search), "coder coder voting functions predict" (Expand search), "coder coder coping function predict" (Expand search), "coder modern coding functions predict" (Expand search), "coder color coding functions predict" (Expand search), "coder odor coding functions predict" (Expand search), "coder decoder coding functions predict" (Expand search), "code code coding functions predict" (Expand search), "decoder codec coding functions predict" (Expand search)
"on python python python programming" » "on pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "on piton python python programming" (Expand search), "on pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "in python pythin python programming" (Expand search), "of python pythof python programming" (Expand search), "_ python pyth_ python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder coding functions predict\") OR (\"on python python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder coding functions predict ) OR ( on python python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder coding functions predict") OR ("on python python python programming"))*.