Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder coding functional state" » "coder coder coating functional state" (Expand search), "coder coder adding functional state" (Expand search), "coder coder coding fractional state" (Expand search), "coder coder coding functional status" (Expand search), "coder coder coding functional scale" (Expand search), "coder coder coding functional study" (Expand search), "coder modern coding functional state" (Expand search), "coder color coding functional state" (Expand search), "coder odor coding functional state" (Expand search), "coder decoder coding functional state" (Expand search), "code code coding functional state" (Expand search), "decoder codec coding functional state" (Expand search)
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder coding functional state\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder coding functional state ) OR ( in python python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder coding functional state") OR ("in python python python programming"))*.