Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder coding functional improvements" » "coder coder coding functional improvement" (Expand search), "coder coder coding function improvement" (Expand search), "coder coder coding functional movements" (Expand search), "coder coder coating functional improvements" (Expand search), "coder coder adding functional improvements" (Expand search), "coder coder coding fractional improvements" (Expand search), "coder modern coding functional improvements" (Expand search), "coder color coding functional improvements" (Expand search), "coder odor coding functional improvements" (Expand search), "coder decoder coding functional improvements" (Expand search), "code code coding functional improvements" (Expand search), "decoder codec coding functional improvements" (Expand search)
"on python python python programming" » "on pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "on piton python python programming" (Expand search), "on pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "in python pythin python programming" (Expand search), "of python pythof python programming" (Expand search), "_ python pyth_ python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder coding functional improvements") OR ("on python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder coding functional improvements\") OR (\"on python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder coding functional improvements ) OR ( on python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder coding functional improvements") OR ("on python python python programming"))*.