Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder coding functional density" » "coder coder coding functional diversity" (Expand search), "coder coder coding functional dentition" (Expand search), "coder coder coding nutritional density" (Expand search), "coder coder coating functional density" (Expand search), "coder coder adding functional density" (Expand search), "coder coder coding fractional density" (Expand search), "coder modern coding functional density" (Expand search), "coder color coding functional density" (Expand search), "coder odor coding functional density" (Expand search), "coder decoder coding functional density" (Expand search), "code code coding functional density" (Expand search), "decoder codec coding functional density" (Expand search)
"on python python python programming" » "on pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "on piton python python programming" (Expand search), "on pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "in python pythin python programming" (Expand search), "of python pythof python programming" (Expand search), "_ python pyth_ python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder coding functional density") OR ("on python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder coding functional density\") OR (\"on python python python programming\"))*".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder coding functional density ) OR ( on python python python programming ))*.