Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder coding frequency effect" » "coder coder loading frequency effect" (Expand search), "coder coder scoring frequency effect" (Expand search), "coder coder fading frequency effect" (Expand search), "coder coder coding frequency effects" (Expand search), "coder modern coding frequency effect" (Expand search), "coder color coding frequency effect" (Expand search), "coder odor coding frequency effect" (Expand search), "coder decoder coding frequency effect" (Expand search), "code code coding frequency effect" (Expand search), "decoder codec coding frequency effect" (Expand search)
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder coding frequency effect") OR ("in python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder coding frequency effect\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder coding frequency effect ) OR ( in python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder coding frequency effect") OR ("in python python python programming"))*.