Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"in python pythons python programming" » "in python python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in python pitons python programming" (Expand search), "in python piton python programming" (Expand search), "_ python pythons python programming" (Expand search)
"coder coder coding first objects" » "coder coder coding first object" (Expand search), "coder coder coding direct objects" (Expand search), "coder coder coding first projects" (Expand search), "coder modern coding first objects" (Expand search), "coder color coding first objects" (Expand search), "coder odor coding first objects" (Expand search), "coder coder modeling first objects" (Expand search), "coder coder avoiding first objects" (Expand search), "coder coder housing first objects" (Expand search), "coder decoder coding first objects" (Expand search), "code code coding first objects" (Expand search), "decoder codec coding first objects" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder coding first objects\") OR (\"in python pythons python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder coding first objects ) OR ( in python pythons python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder coding first objects") OR ("in python pythons python programming"))*.