Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder coding efficiency loss" » "coder coder feeding efficiency loss" (Expand search), "coder coder cutting efficiency loss" (Expand search), "coder coder spending efficiency loss" (Expand search), "coder coder coding efficiency class" (Expand search), "coder coder coding efficiency law" (Expand search), "coder coder coding efficiency based" (Expand search), "coder modern coding efficiency loss" (Expand search), "coder color coding efficiency loss" (Expand search), "coder odor coding efficiency loss" (Expand search), "coder decoder coding efficiency loss" (Expand search), "code code coding efficiency loss" (Expand search), "decoder codec coding efficiency loss" (Expand search)
"_ python python python programming" » "_ pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ piton python python programming" (Expand search), "_ pitons python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder coding efficiency loss") OR ("_ python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder coding efficiency loss\") OR (\"_ python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder coding efficiency loss ) OR ( _ python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder coding efficiency loss") OR ("_ python python python programming"))*.