Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder coding efficiency law" » "coder coder feeding efficiency law" (Expand search), "coder coder cutting efficiency law" (Expand search), "coder coder spending efficiency law" (Expand search), "coder coder coding efficiency an" (Expand search), "coder coder coding efficiency at" (Expand search), "coder coder coding efficiency and" (Expand search), "coder modern coding efficiency law" (Expand search), "coder color coding efficiency law" (Expand search), "coder odor coding efficiency law" (Expand search), "coder decoder coding efficiency law" (Expand search), "code code coding efficiency law" (Expand search), "decoder codec coding efficiency law" (Expand search)
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder coding efficiency law") OR ("in python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder coding efficiency law\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder coding efficiency law ) OR ( in python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder coding efficiency law") OR ("in python python python programming"))*.