Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder coding efficiency based" » "coder coder feeding efficiency based" (Expand search), "coder coder cutting efficiency based" (Expand search), "coder coder spending efficiency based" (Expand search), "coder coder coding efficiency and" (Expand search), "coder coder coding efficiency by" (Expand search), "coder coder coding efficiency an" (Expand search), "coder modern coding efficiency based" (Expand search), "coder color coding efficiency based" (Expand search), "coder odor coding efficiency based" (Expand search), "coder decoder coding efficiency based" (Expand search), "code code coding efficiency based" (Expand search), "decoder codec coding efficiency based" (Expand search)
"on python python python programming" » "on pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "on piton python python programming" (Expand search), "on pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "in python pythin python programming" (Expand search), "of python pythof python programming" (Expand search), "_ python pyth_ python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder coding efficiency based") OR ("on python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder coding efficiency based\") OR (\"on python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder coding efficiency based ) OR ( on python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder coding efficiency based") OR ("on python python python programming"))*.