Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)
"coder coder coding diet increases" » "coder modern coding diet increases" (Expand search), "coder color coding diet increases" (Expand search), "coder odor coding diet increases" (Expand search), "coder decoder coding diet increases" (Expand search), "code code coding diet increases" (Expand search), "decoder codec coding diet increases" (Expand search), "coder coder coupling diet increases" (Expand search), "coder coder feeding diet increases" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder coding diet increases\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder coding diet increases ) OR ( in python python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder coding diet increases") OR ("in python python python programming"))*.