Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder coding dependent funcional" » "coder coder coding dependent functional" (Expand search), "coder coder coding dependent functionals" (Expand search), "coder coder coding dependent functionally" (Expand search), "coder coder becoming dependent funcional" (Expand search), "coder coder sliding dependent funcional" (Expand search), "coder coder smoking dependent funcional" (Expand search), "coder modern coding dependent funcional" (Expand search), "coder color coding dependent funcional" (Expand search), "coder odor coding dependent funcional" (Expand search), "coder decoder coding dependent funcional" (Expand search), "code code coding dependent funcional" (Expand search), "decoder codec coding dependent funcional" (Expand search)
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder coding dependent funcional") OR ("in python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder coding dependent funcional\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder coding dependent funcional ) OR ( in python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder coding dependent funcional") OR ("in python python python programming"))*.