Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder coding conventions efficiency" » "coder coder coding convection efficiency" (Expand search), "coder coder coding conversion efficiency" (Expand search), "coder coder coding connection efficiency" (Expand search), "coder coder reading conventions efficiency" (Expand search), "coder coder writing conventions efficiency" (Expand search), "coder coder social conventions efficiency" (Expand search), "coder modern coding conventions efficiency" (Expand search), "coder color coding conventions efficiency" (Expand search), "coder odor coding conventions efficiency" (Expand search), "coder decoder coding conventions efficiency" (Expand search), "code code coding conventions efficiency" (Expand search), "decoder codec coding conventions efficiency" (Expand search)
"on python python python programming" » "on pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "on piton python python programming" (Expand search), "on pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "in python pythin python programming" (Expand search), "of python pythof python programming" (Expand search), "_ python pyth_ python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder coding conventions efficiency") OR ("on python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder coding conventions efficiency\") OR (\"on python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder coding conventions efficiency ) OR ( on python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder coding conventions efficiency") OR ("on python python python programming"))*.