Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder coding control efficacy" » "coder coder coding control efficiency" (Expand search), "coder coder coding vitro efficacy" (Expand search), "coder coder holding control efficacy" (Expand search), "coder coder doping control efficacy" (Expand search), "coder coder losing control efficacy" (Expand search), "coder modern coding control efficacy" (Expand search), "coder color coding control efficacy" (Expand search), "coder odor coding control efficacy" (Expand search), "coder decoder coding control efficacy" (Expand search), "code code coding control efficacy" (Expand search), "decoder codec coding control efficacy" (Expand search)
"on python python python programming" » "on pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "on piton python python programming" (Expand search), "on pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "in python pythin python programming" (Expand search), "of python pythof python programming" (Expand search), "_ python pyth_ python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder coding control efficacy") OR ("on python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder coding control efficacy\") OR (\"on python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder coding control efficacy ) OR ( on python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder coding control efficacy") OR ("on python python python programming"))*.