Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)
"coder coder coding be proposed" » "coder modern coding be proposed" (Expand search), "coder color coding be proposed" (Expand search), "coder odor coding be proposed" (Expand search), "coder decoder coding be proposed" (Expand search), "code code coding be proposed" (Expand search), "decoder codec coding be proposed" (Expand search), "coder coder coding the proposed" (Expand search), "coder coder coding new proposed" (Expand search), "coder coder coding _ proposed" (Expand search), "coder coder coding by proposed" (Expand search), "coder coder crowding be proposed" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder coding be proposed") OR ("in python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder coding be proposed\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder coding be proposed ) OR ( in python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder coding be proposed") OR ("in python python python programming"))*.