Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder coding are implicated" » "coder coder coding is implicated" (Expand search), "coder coder coding are impacted" (Expand search), "coder coder coding genes implicated" (Expand search), "coder modern coding are implicated" (Expand search), "coder color coding are implicated" (Expand search), "coder odor coding are implicated" (Expand search), "coder decoder coding are implicated" (Expand search), "code code coding are implicated" (Expand search), "decoder codec coding are implicated" (Expand search), "coder coder coping are implicated" (Expand search), "coder coder coding and implicated" (Expand search), "coder coder coding the implicated" (Expand search)
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder coding are implicated") OR ("in python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder coding are implicated\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder coding are implicated ) OR ( in python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder coding are implicated") OR ("in python python python programming"))*.