Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)
"coder coder coding and depending" » "coder coder coding and defending" (Expand search), "coder coder coding and descending" (Expand search), "coder coder coding bank depending" (Expand search), "coder modern coding and depending" (Expand search), "coder color coding and depending" (Expand search), "coder odor coding and depending" (Expand search), "coder decoder coding and depending" (Expand search), "code code coding and depending" (Expand search), "decoder codec coding and depending" (Expand search), "coder coder coding rna depending" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder coding and depending") OR ("in python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder coding and depending\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder coding and depending ) OR ( in python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder coding and depending") OR ("in python python python programming"))*.