Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder coding allocation model" » "coder coder coding automation model" (Expand search), "coder coder computing allocation model" (Expand search), "coder coder damping allocation model" (Expand search), "coder coder coding allocation of" (Expand search), "coder coder coding allocation and" (Expand search), "coder coder coding allocation to" (Expand search), "coder modern coding allocation model" (Expand search), "coder color coding allocation model" (Expand search), "coder odor coding allocation model" (Expand search), "coder decoder coding allocation model" (Expand search), "code code coding allocation model" (Expand search), "decoder codec coding allocation model" (Expand search)
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder coding allocation model\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder coding allocation model ) OR ( in python python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder coding allocation model") OR ("in python python python programming"))*.