Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder code usage effects" » "coder coder code dosage effects" (Expand search), "coder coder code age effects" (Expand search), "coder coder code wage effects" (Expand search), "coder decoder code usage effects" (Expand search), "code code code usage effects" (Expand search), "decoder codec code usage effects" (Expand search), "code coder code usage effects" (Expand search), "modern coder code usage effects" (Expand search), "color coder code usage effects" (Expand search), "coder coder codon usage effects" (Expand search), "coder coder code use effects" (Expand search), "coder coder care usage effects" (Expand search)
"on python python python programming" » "on pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "on piton python python programming" (Expand search), "on pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "in python pythin python programming" (Expand search), "of python pythof python programming" (Expand search), "_ python pyth_ python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder code usage effects") OR ("on python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder code usage effects\") OR (\"on python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder code usage effects ) OR ( on python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder code usage effects") OR ("on python python python programming"))*.