Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder code integration effort" » "coder coder code integration efforts" (Expand search), "coder coder code integration effect" (Expand search), "coder coder code integration effects" (Expand search), "coder coder care integration effort" (Expand search), "coder coder bone integration effort" (Expand search), "coder coder scale integration effort" (Expand search), "coder decoder code integration effort" (Expand search), "code code code integration effort" (Expand search), "decoder codec code integration effort" (Expand search), "code coder code integration effort" (Expand search), "modern coder code integration effort" (Expand search), "color coder code integration effort" (Expand search)
"on python python python programming" » "on pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "on piton python python programming" (Expand search), "on pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "in python pythin python programming" (Expand search), "of python pythof python programming" (Expand search), "_ python pyth_ python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder code integration effort") OR ("on python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder code integration effort\") OR (\"on python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder code integration effort ) OR ( on python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder code integration effort") OR ("on python python python programming"))*.