Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder code embedding problem" » "coder coder code emerging problem" (Expand search), "coder coder node embedding problem" (Expand search), "coder coder node embeddings problem" (Expand search), "coder coder words embedding problem" (Expand search), "coder decoder code embedding problem" (Expand search), "code code code embedding problem" (Expand search), "decoder codec code embedding problem" (Expand search), "code coder code embedding problem" (Expand search), "modern coder code embedding problem" (Expand search), "color coder code embedding problem" (Expand search)
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder code embedding problem\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder code embedding problem ) OR ( in python python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder code embedding problem") OR ("in python python python programming"))*.