Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder code computational cost" » "coder coder model computational cost" (Expand search), "coder coder cfd computational cost" (Expand search), "coder coder some computational cost" (Expand search), "coder coder code computational and" (Expand search), "coder coder code computational design" (Expand search), "coder coder code computational vision" (Expand search), "coder decoder code computational cost" (Expand search), "code code code computational cost" (Expand search), "decoder codec code computational cost" (Expand search), "code coder code computational cost" (Expand search), "modern coder code computational cost" (Expand search), "color coder code computational cost" (Expand search)
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder code computational cost") OR ("in python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder code computational cost\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder code computational cost ) OR ( in python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder code computational cost") OR ("in python python python programming"))*.