Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder by adaptive programming" » "coder coder by reactive programming" (Expand search), "coder coder by adaptive programs" (Expand search), "coder coder by objective programming" (Expand search), "coder decoder by adaptive programming" (Expand search), "code code by adaptive programming" (Expand search), "decoder codec by adaptive programming" (Expand search), "coder coder an adaptive programming" (Expand search), "coder coder _ adaptive programming" (Expand search), "coder coder by additive programming" (Expand search), "coder code by adaptive programming" (Expand search), "coder codes by adaptive programming" (Expand search), "coder coded by adaptive programming" (Expand search)
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder by adaptive programming") OR ("in python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder by adaptive programming\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder by adaptive programming ) OR ( in python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder by adaptive programming") OR ("in python python python programming"))*.