Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder binding funcional programming" » "coder coder binding functional programming" (Expand search), "coder coder binding fractional programming" (Expand search), "coder coder binding nutritional programming" (Expand search), "coder coder bringing functional programming" (Expand search), "coder coder indice funcional programming" (Expand search), "coder coder timing funcional programming" (Expand search), "coder copper binding funcional programming" (Expand search), "coder core binding funcional programming" (Expand search), "coder odor binding funcional programming" (Expand search), "coder decoder binding funcional programming" (Expand search), "code code binding funcional programming" (Expand search), "decoder codec binding funcional programming" (Expand search)
"on python python python programming" » "on pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "on piton python python programming" (Expand search), "on pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "in python pythin python programming" (Expand search), "of python pythof python programming" (Expand search), "_ python pyth_ python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder binding funcional programming") OR ("on python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder binding funcional programming\") OR (\"on python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder binding funcional programming ) OR ( on python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder binding funcional programming") OR ("on python python python programming"))*.