Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)
"coder coder binary faust process" » "coder coder binary fast process" (Expand search), "coder coder binary last process" (Expand search), "coder coder binary first process" (Expand search), "coder cover binary faust process" (Expand search), "coder over binary faust process" (Expand search), "coder under binary faust process" (Expand search), "coder coder binary base process" (Expand search), "coder coder binary alsi process" (Expand search), "coder coder binary blast process" (Expand search), "coder decoder binary faust process" (Expand search), "code code binary faust process" (Expand search), "decoder codec binary faust process" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder binary faust process\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder binary faust process ) OR ( in python python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder binary faust process") OR ("in python python python programming"))*.