Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder based logical programming" » "coder coder based logic programming" (Expand search), "coder coder based physical programming" (Expand search), "coder coder based goal programming" (Expand search), "coder coder based local programming" (Expand search), "coder coder based topical programming" (Expand search), "coder decoder based logical programming" (Expand search), "code code based logical programming" (Expand search), "decoder codec based logical programming" (Expand search), "coder code based logical programming" (Expand search), "coder foder based logical programming" (Expand search), "coder codec based logical programming" (Expand search)
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder based logical programming") OR ("in python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder based logical programming\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder based logical programming ) OR ( in python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder based logical programming") OR ("in python python python programming"))*.