Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder based inductive programming" » "coder coder based disjunctive programming" (Expand search), "coder coder based objective programming" (Expand search), "coder coder based reactive programming" (Expand search), "coder coder based conductive programming" (Expand search), "coder coder and inductive programming" (Expand search), "coder coder based ductile programming" (Expand search), "coder decoder based inductive programming" (Expand search), "code code based inductive programming" (Expand search), "decoder codec based inductive programming" (Expand search), "coder code based inductive programming" (Expand search), "coder foder based inductive programming" (Expand search), "coder codec based inductive programming" (Expand search)
"_ python python python programming" » "_ pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ piton python python programming" (Expand search), "_ pitons python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder based inductive programming") OR ("_ python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder based inductive programming\") OR (\"_ python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder based inductive programming ) OR ( _ python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder based inductive programming") OR ("_ python python python programming"))*.