Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder based collision in" » "coder coder based coalition in" (Expand search), "coder coder nested collision in" (Expand search), "coder coder and collision in" (Expand search), "coder coder based collisions in" (Expand search), "coder coder based collision of" (Expand search), "coder coder based collision at" (Expand search), "coder decoder based collision in" (Expand search), "code code based collision in" (Expand search), "decoder codec based collision in" (Expand search), "coder code based collision in" (Expand search), "coder foder based collision in" (Expand search), "coder codec based collision in" (Expand search)
"_ python python python programming" » "_ pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ piton python python programming" (Expand search), "_ pitons python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder based collision in") OR ("_ python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder based collision in\") OR (\"_ python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder based collision in ) OR ( _ python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder based collision in") OR ("_ python python python programming"))*.