Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder aware logical programming" » "coder coder aware logic programming" (Expand search), "coder coder aware goal programming" (Expand search), "coder coder aware conic programming" (Expand search), "coder decoder aware logical programming" (Expand search), "code code aware logical programming" (Expand search), "decoder codec aware logical programming" (Expand search), "coder power aware logical programming" (Expand search), "coder color aware logical programming" (Expand search), "coder gender aware logical programming" (Expand search)
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder aware logical programming") OR ("in python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder aware logical programming\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))*".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder aware logical programming ) OR ( in python python python programming ))*.