Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder attention conic programming" » "coder coder attention logic programming" (Expand search), "coder coder attention cone programming" (Expand search), "coder coder attention convex programming" (Expand search), "coder covert attention conic programming" (Expand search), "coder cancer attention conic programming" (Expand search), "coder proper attention conic programming" (Expand search), "coder coder attention basic programming" (Expand search), "coder coder attention can programming" (Expand search), "coder coder attention chain programming" (Expand search), "coder decoder attention conic programming" (Expand search), "code code attention conic programming" (Expand search), "decoder codec attention conic programming" (Expand search)
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder attention conic programming") OR ("in python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder attention conic programming\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder attention conic programming ) OR ( in python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder attention conic programming") OR ("in python python python programming"))*.