Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder ascending content object" » "coder coder ascending concept object" (Expand search), "coder coder accounting content object" (Expand search), "coder coder ascending colon object" (Expand search), "coder coder ascending content effect" (Expand search), "coder coder ascending content affect" (Expand search), "coder coder ascending concurrent object" (Expand search), "coder decoder ascending content object" (Expand search), "code code ascending content object" (Expand search), "decoder codec ascending content object" (Expand search)
"on python python python programming" » "on pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "on piton python python programming" (Expand search), "on pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "in python pythin python programming" (Expand search), "of python pythof python programming" (Expand search), "_ python pyth_ python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder ascending content object") OR ("on python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder ascending content object\") OR (\"on python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder ascending content object ) OR ( on python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder ascending content object") OR ("on python python python programming"))*.