Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder are linked programming" » "coder coder are line programming" (Expand search), "coder coder are linear programming" (Expand search), "coder coder are lineal programming" (Expand search), "coder decoder are linked programming" (Expand search), "code code are linked programming" (Expand search), "decoder codec are linked programming" (Expand search), "coder code are linked programming" (Expand search), "coder code art linked programming" (Expand search), "coder older are linked programming" (Expand search)
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder are linked programming") OR ("in python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder are linked programming\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder are linked programming ) OR ( in python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder are linked programming") OR ("in python python python programming"))*.