Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder applying temporal progress" » "coder coder employing temporal progress" (Expand search), "coder coder applying empirical progress" (Expand search), "coder coder applying neural progress" (Expand search), "coder model applying temporal progress" (Expand search), "coder after applying temporal progress" (Expand search), "coder could applying temporal progress" (Expand search), "coder decoder applying temporal progress" (Expand search), "code code applying temporal progress" (Expand search), "decoder codec applying temporal progress" (Expand search)
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder applying temporal progress") OR ("in python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder applying temporal progress\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder applying temporal progress ) OR ( in python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder applying temporal progress") OR ("in python python python programming"))*.