Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder applying tangible programming" » "coder coder applying language programming" (Expand search), "coder coder applying time programming" (Expand search), "coder coder applying article programming" (Expand search), "coder coder applying triple programming" (Expand search), "coder model applying tangible programming" (Expand search), "coder after applying tangible programming" (Expand search), "coder could applying tangible programming" (Expand search), "coder decoder applying tangible programming" (Expand search), "code code applying tangible programming" (Expand search), "decoder codec applying tangible programming" (Expand search)
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder applying tangible programming\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder applying tangible programming ) OR ( in python python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder applying tangible programming") OR ("in python python python programming"))*.