Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder applying statistical protocols" » "coder coder applying statistical process" (Expand search), "coder coder applying statistical tools" (Expand search), "coder coder applying statistical controls" (Expand search), "coder coder using statistical protocols" (Expand search), "coder coder applied statistics protocols" (Expand search), "coder coder breeding statistical protocols" (Expand search), "coder model applying statistical protocols" (Expand search), "coder after applying statistical protocols" (Expand search), "coder could applying statistical protocols" (Expand search), "coder decoder applying statistical protocols" (Expand search), "code code applying statistical protocols" (Expand search), "decoder codec applying statistical protocols" (Expand search)
"_ python python python programming" » "_ pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ piton python python programming" (Expand search), "_ pitons python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder applying statistical protocols") OR ("_ python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder applying statistical protocols\") OR (\"_ python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder applying statistical protocols ) OR ( _ python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder applying statistical protocols") OR ("_ python python python programming"))*.