Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder applying singular programming" » "coder coder applying circular programming" (Expand search), "coder coder applying single programming" (Expand search), "coder coder applying linear programming" (Expand search), "coder model applying singular programming" (Expand search), "coder after applying singular programming" (Expand search), "coder could applying singular programming" (Expand search), "coder decoder applying singular programming" (Expand search), "code code applying singular programming" (Expand search), "decoder codec applying singular programming" (Expand search)
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder applying singular programming\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder applying singular programming ) OR ( in python python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder applying singular programming") OR ("in python python python programming"))*.