Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder applying proximal programming" » "coder coder applying logical programming" (Expand search), "coder coder applying physical programming" (Expand search), "coder coder applying procedural programming" (Expand search), "coder coder applying principal programming" (Expand search), "coder coder applying critical programming" (Expand search), "coder coder applying formal programming" (Expand search), "coder model applying proximal programming" (Expand search), "coder after applying proximal programming" (Expand search), "coder could applying proximal programming" (Expand search), "coder decoder applying proximal programming" (Expand search), "code code applying proximal programming" (Expand search), "decoder codec applying proximal programming" (Expand search)
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder applying proximal programming") OR ("in python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder applying proximal programming\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))*".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder applying proximal programming ) OR ( in python python python programming ))*.